For this assignment, answer the following questions. When answering, explain your answer, even if the question doesn't specifically instruct you to do so.

1. For this question, assume that an officer makes a stop based on reasonable suspicion, reasonably believes that the suspect may be armed, conducts a pat-down search, and finds no weapons.The office also has a reasonable suspicion that the suspect may be in possession of illegal drugs.Is it constitutionally permissible for the officer to continue the search to look for evidence after the pat-down does not reveal any weapons?
2. In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court held that reasonable suspicion is an objective standard. Explain what that means in the context of criminal procedure.
3. What is a subjective standard of, and how does such a standard compare to an objective standard?
4. Can the determination of reasonable suspicion be based on hearsay, either in whole or part?Whether your answer is yes or no, explain your answer and give some examples.
5. Is it constitutional for an officer to demand that a suspect disclose his or her name to the officer? If so, does the officer have to have reasonable suspicion to stop a citizen and ask for his or her name?

Book if needed: Criminal Procedure Author: Lippman, Matthew Publisher: Sage Edition/Year: 5th 2022