For this chapter's journal entry, read the section Negligent Misstatement

The purpose of this entry is to tie-in the key concepts of negligent misstatement to the case law that has been discussed

In order to earn full marks for this entry, you must tell aboutHedley Byrne v. Hellerin the context of the above in addition to the following other cases:

Hedley Byrne v. Heller

Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young,

Haig v. Bamford,

Annsv. Merton,

London Borough Council,andDonoghue v. Stevenson.

Note: you may need to look up cases using CanLII ( https://www.canlii.org/en/ ) or BAILII (Hedley Byrne v Heller)

Objectives for this entry:

1) Briefly explain why each case is important in the context of negligent misstatement (a single paragraph will do for each case)

2) Explain how knowing what you have learned about negligent misstatement has changed your thinking about either receiving advice from a professional or giving advice as a professional (for those of you who plan to be a licenced professional who gives advice