For this Individual Case Analysis, use the six$-$step decision making model to find a solution on how to properly compensate of CEO's of charitable companies, particularly those that are heavily tied to government organizations. Remember to consider your solution both in terms of ethics and morality and from a business perspective. Consider the following questions $($you will be answering these questions throughout your paper$)$: What are the ethical issues that arise from this case, particularly when a government funds a product and then makes that product mandatory $($in many cases$)$ throughout the country?What stakeholders are affected by these CEO's being compensated so dramatically? If you were a member of the government or on the board of directors for Moderna, what alternative compensation packages could have been offered to Bancel? Would you have done anything differently? Remember to evaluate each of these alternatives $($three minimum$)$ under each of the three frameworks.