For "Was that Harassment?" Harvard Case Study,

A. Identify as many morally acceptable options to resolve this situation as possible (3-5 options).

B. Analyze the options, and determine which option has the best (i.e., most compelling) moral justification for action (or is most consistent with your own ethical code of conduct).

C. Analyze leading candidates for action against other important (prudential) criteria, such as financial consequences, feasibility, strategic results, ability of participants to actually carry out the option, and other criteria deemed useful.