Frank Jones owns a restaurant in Tucson, Arizona. In order for a restaurant to sell alcohol in Arizona, it must have a license from the state government. To keep that license, restaurants have to follow certain rules. One rule is that restaurant employees have to examine the ID of anybody ordering alcohol that looks under the age of 30. Frank's restaurant gets 60% of its income from sales of beer and wine. Last month, however, John Smith, a waiter at Frank's restaurant, failed to ask for the ID of a young looking customer. The customer ended up being an employee of the Arizona Department of Liquor and one week later Frank received a letter saying his restaurant's liquor license would be terminated in seven days. The letter also stated that Frank had the opportunity to submit a written statement challenging the determination. Frank thinks this violates his due process rights. What are some arguments that show AZ's procedure is constitutional? Unconstitutional?