From the given provision from the Articles in SECTION 3 Easement of Right of Way of the The Civil Code of the Philippines TITLE VII Easements or Servitude, provide a brief explanation and provide a practical example that may be interpreted into an illustration.

SOURCE: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jnr7k886kvXZmi9FhzdkprHFHkZt1rV1/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101107662003834250991&rtpof=true&sd=true

Format

1) SECTION 3 Easement of Right of Way

ARTICLE 650

Provision: The easement of right of way shall be established at the point least prejudicial to

the servient estate, and, insofar as consistent with this rule, where the distance from the

dominant estate to a public highway may be the shortest.

Explanation: [also provide a practical example that can be later interpreted in an illustration. NOTE: you don't have to make an illustration. Just provide an example]

2) SECTION 3 Easement of Right of Way

ARTICLE 655

Provision: If the right of way granted to a surrounded estate ceases to be necessary because

its owner has joined it to another abutting on a public road, the owner of the servient estate

may demand that the easement be extinguished, returning what he may have received by way

of indemnity. The interest on the indemnity shall be deemed to be in payment of rent for the

use of the easement. The same rule shall be applied in case a new road is opened giving access to the isolated estate. In both cases, the public highway must substantially meet the needs of the dominant estate in order that the easement may be extinguished.

Explanation: [also provide a practical example that can be later interpreted in an illustration. NOTE: you don't have to make an illustration. Just provide an example]

Preferably a filipino architecture or law tutor! Thank you.