Question: Full sample analysis and point estimate (adjusted for missing data), showed an identical relative risk of 2.00 and a risk difference of 0.22. There were
Full sample analysis and point estimate (adjusted for missing data), showed an identical relative risk of 2.00 and a risk difference of 0.22. There were 91 observations that were excluded from the original sample, which represents a 2.05% reduction in data. Is there a meaningful selection bias introduced by excluding observations with missing data
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
