Gal, Jensen, & Stein in their study "Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management" use a Virtue Ethics perspective to evaluate the effect that AI and algorithmic management might have on managers in the future. Which of the following best reflects their view of nudging, or the way an AI system would work to alter a manager's behaviour through the system's knowledge of the manager's emotional states, political and moral views, etc?

Question 19 options:

	Nudging could prevent a manager from thinking clearly and ethically about significant choices
	Nudging could keep managers alert by forcing them to have to figure out what the AI system is trying to get them to do
	Nudging could greatly enhance a manager's productivity by simplifying the decisions a manager faces
	Nudging could be the best way to guarantee choices that reflect the greatest happiness for the greatest number

Question 20 (2.5 points)

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

In their study of our use of technologies like mobile phones, Klimmt, and others argue that we have a "Motivational Disposition" as part of what they call our vigilance or our "psychological readiness to perceive and respond" in relation to our devices.

Which of the following is the best example of this vigilance and motivational disposition?

Question 20 options:

	When we are meeting in person with a group of friends and having fun, we do not let prompts from our phone interrupt us
	When we are meeting in person with a group of friends and having fun, and yet we will respond to a prompt on our phone
	When we are meeting in person with a group of friends and having fun, and we are careful to switch off our phone so as not to be interrupted
	When we are meeting in person with a group of friends and having fun, and we get angry with friends when they respond to prompts on their phones