Question: Generalize the preceding argument to prove that we cannot merge states , f there exists a string such that (,) and (,) . (Hint: Induct
Generalize the preceding argument to prove that we cannot merge states , f there exists a string such that (,) and (,) . (Hint: Induct on the length of .) As we will see, it turns out that this yields a condition that is both necessary and sufficient for merging states. Formally, if :((,) (,) ), then , are equivalent and can be merged. We begin by formalizing the notion of equivalent states.

Part 3. (5 points) Generalize the preceding argument to prove that we cannot merge states p, q if there exists a string x * such that A(p, x) E F and A(q,x) & F. (Hint: Induct on the length of x.) As we will see, it turns out that this yields a condition that is both necessary and sufficient for merging states. Formally, if Vx *:(^(p, x) EF AA(q,x) E F), then p, q are equivalent and can be merged. We begin by formalizing the notion of equivalent states
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
