Question: Given a relational schema R ( A , B , C , D ) , A - > - > BC does not logically imply
Given a relational schema RA B C D A BC does not logically imply A B this is true for FDs but not for MVDs Construct an example to illustrate this ie a relation instance where the former holds, but the latter doesn't
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
