Question: given an ocaml definition of a recursive function foo:nat - - > nat, how do you write its definition using letrec in the simply typed
given an ocaml definition of a recursive function foo:nat nat,
how do you write its definition using letrec in the simply typed lambda calculus. letrec requires that the definition be USED after it is defined as in letrec foo:typ whatever in foo
How do you to translate that into a definition using FIX t
How dp you evaluate it
how to type a term and give its typing derivation that uses let, or fix
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
