Given what we have learned about the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, do you believe that it is justifiable to characterize international criminal law after the Second World War as a form of "victor's justice"? Remember that "victor's justice" is what some critics of international criminal law call the prosecution by one or more victorious states of officials of one or more de- feated states, particularly when officials of the victorious states who are accused of having com- mitted international crimes are not themselves prosecuted. Why or why not?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/25716817?casa_token=JyDYD5pk600AAAAA%3AdfzyaY1iM3xJ_xnZuJHA-1py35gBLYm79ECK_y1vo8Jn19mfhEzs4p9iehuuwkmbpGjubeNeXz3YUdUyZEv272tot4PH69PcLJeyNIUsHivWQhfk1QU&seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents