Good morning . I need help with a case ( course legal research)

the case In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation.

What's the citation of the case? Who are the parties to the appeal (not the casenote the word Appellant in the singular)? What's the difference between an appellant and an appellee? There are multiple appellees in this casehow do we know that? o Warren Henness is on death row for conduct occurring back in what year? o What is Mr. Henness's central argument in the lawsuit, and the argument that he presented to the District Court? Which two drugs does he reference?

o What burden does a death row inmate have to show in order to prove that a State's method of execution will violate the 8th Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment? With respect to the first prong of the so-called Glossip analysis "needless pain and suffering"what did the District Court find? Does the Sixth Circuit agree with the District Court? Why not? How does the Sixth Circuit dismiss concerns from the death row prisoner about the pain he claims he will experience on lethal injection. o The second prong that a death row prisoner must show in order to avoid a State's chosen method of execution is what? What did the District Court hold with respect to the second prong? Does the Sixth Circuit agree? What is the death row prisoner's proposed alternative means of death? Is it a viable alternative? In the end, what does the Sixth Circuit do with Mr. Henness's request for a STAY of his execution?

link :https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/19a0299p-06.pdf

THANK YOU SO MUCH.