Graph A and Graph B both show the carbon dioxide emission, In thousands of metric tons, from a local power plant for the years 2017 through 2024. (Both graphs show exactly the same data.) Graph A Graph B Carbon dioxide emission Carbon dioxide emission (In thousands of metric tons] [In thousands of metric tons) 3047 3018 2019 3030 3030 3022 2025 3034 3017 3048 3019 2030 2021 3031 3001 2024 (a) Give a rough estimate of the change in yearly carbon dioxide emission from 2017 to 2024. (Choose the best answer.) X It decreased by about 10% O It decreased by 5. It decreased by a factor of 10, so In 2024 the yearly carbon dioxide emission was only 1 no of what it was in 2017. It increased by a factor of 10, so In 2024 the yearly carbon dioxide emission was 10 times what it was in 2017. (b] Approximate to the nearest whole number (In thousands of metric tons) the change in the yearly carbon dioxide emission from 2017 to 2024. I thousand metric tons (c) Which of the two graphs is more likely to be misleading? Why? (Choose the best answer.) In Graph A, the heights of the bars look very different, which suggests there was a relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the heights of the bars are visually similar, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person Into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2017 and 2024 was larger than it really was. O In Graph A, the heights of the bars are visually similar, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the heights of the bars look very different, which suggests there was relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2017 and 2024 was smaller than it really was. In Graph A, the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission are exaggerated. In Graph B, the heights of the bars have the same relative ize as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person iinto thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide amission between 2017 and 2024 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the baseline is at 128 instead of 0, so the heights of the bars have the same relative size as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the baseline is at 0, which exaggerates the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2017 and 2024 was larger than it really was