GROUP ONE

Critically analyse and contrast the court's decision in the cases of Heuff v Mbewe, and Sata v The post news paper

1. Outline the rules relating to public policy immunity
2. Compare and contrast public policy immunity and privilege
3. Compare and contrast legal advice privilege and litigation privilege
4. Scrutinise the different rules of ethics under the Legal practitioners rules analyse those relating to lawyer/client privilege
5. What is without prejudiced privilege and when can a party claim the same?

Group two

1. Critically analyse the decisions in the cases of (1) Munalula v the people (2) O Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 (3)Melody Chibuye v the people (4) Boardman v Director of Public Prosecutions
2. Outline the rules relating to evidence of character, when can the same be admitted (cite authority)
3. What is similar fact evidence?
4. Is similar fact evidence admissible?
5. When can the court exercise its judicial discretion to exclude evidence?
6. Compare and contrast a hostile witness and an unfavourable witness

Group three

To prove any fact in court one needs evidence

Do you agree with the above statement? If not outline it's qualifications

Group four

Analyse the rules relating to

1. Examination in chief
2. Cross examination
3. Re-examination