HANDWRITTEN (I will surely downvote if you give generic answer or if you miss even one of the sections mentioned below. If you don't know the answer, please skip it and let others answer it).Because up to 80 percent of the smart ability is inherited, it may be surprising that intelligence tests have increased. In reality, today's grandparents seem mentally disabled as opposed to the grandparents of today. Let's first examine the evidence for increasing test scores. So we are going to go over the explanations for the performance. At an IQ scale of 100, the scores rise at a pace of about 3 points per decade, meaning that if your grandfather scores 100, the average success of your generation would be 115. This is an important distinction a standard deviation indicating that someone with an 84th percentile score in your grandparents generation would be average (50th percentile) according to current expectations. James Flynn, an academic from New Zealand, is the first to note an increase in test scores. In 1984, he presented his results and found that almost anyone who passed an IQ exam well-validated in the 70s was better than those who passed it in the 1940s. The results are generally applicable across cultures. In almost every other nation where the effect is studied, test scores are improving not just in the United States. How is this occurrence caused? (called the influence of Flynn) Although researchers are not sure, some of the hypotheses suggested are as follows: First step is education. Education. Today, the students are more qualified than their predecessors and the results of this training are higher exam scores. 2. Houses with less guests The average couple had four children in 1900; today the average couple have just two children. We know also that firstborns have higher IQs than other babies and they get more priority than their later-born relatives. 3. Knowledge of the testing. Children today have been tested so many times that they are knowledgeable in examination: they know how to take tests and perform them well. Genes are four. Genes are four. Since smart couples have fewer than more children (leading us to assume that population intelligence would decrease with time), those with the right genes are likely to be able to use these benefits more effectively as a consequence of increased learning, tracking and measurement. Genetic scientists have also suggested that if the intellect genes of both parents were dominant, the IQ of the infant would be as high or as high as the parents. They know just enough to take examinations. along with Genes number four. Genes number four. When smart couples have less and not more children (in order to encourage us to conclude that population intelligence would decrease with time), those with the right genes would probably be better prepared to take advantage of these benefits due to increased education, tracking and measurement. Genetics experts have also suggested that the children's IQ will be as high or higher than their parents if all parents' intelligence genes are dominant. Question 1: Do you think it is true/believable that the people are smarter now than in the past? Would it need to be believed? Question 2: One of the reasons you consider to be the most important in the case of the "Flynn" effect trigger? Give your response an interpretation. Your answers should rely on the evidence presented and on other commonly encountered cases (examples should be precise and clear).