hello, i need help IRAC with this case ?

FACTS OF THE CASE: On August 24, 1924, Helen Palsgraf alongside 2 of her girls named Elizabeth and Lilian matured 15 and 12 years were holding back to board a train on stage worked by the Long Island Railroad Company, another train halted at the station and 2 men dashed to get as it pulled away. The principal man came to securely while the subsequent who was conveying a bundle with him, staggered as he was attempting to board the train. At the point when the train group part attempted to help him and push him inside, for the most noticeably terrible reason the bundle from the man's hand dropped and detonated as it contained firecrackers in it. Because of the power of the blast, it brought about bringing down of the coin worked scale on Hellen Palsgraf, albeit nobody was genuinely harmed to be taken to clinic however Hellen Palsgraf was recorded as harmed. After this episode the offended party i.e., Ms Palsgraf recorded this claim for wounds because of the litigant's supposed carelessness. Palsgraf's physical issue was recorded in The New York Times as a shock; she additionally experienced wounding, yet the great ways from the impact to the scale were portrayed in HOLDIE the Times as "more than ten feet away" (3 meters). Following a few days, she fostered a terrible stammer, and her PCP affirmed at preliminary that it was because of the injury of the occasions at East New York station. ARGUMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF: Palsgraf on second October 1924, documented a suit against the Railroad in the Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, a primer level court, in Brooklyn. Instructions: Using the attached template and format: In your own words, thoroughly examine the following case Miranda v. Arizona (1966) using the IRAC method for legal analysis; and give your opinion on the case. Summarize the facts of the case. (Refer only to the facts provided in the attached case.) Issue: What is/are the key legal issue(s) in the case? Rule of Law: What rules of law apply to the case? Application: How did the court apply the rules of law to the facts and circumstances of the case? Conclusion: What was the court's decision in the case