HELLO I WROTE THIS SUMMARY BELOW . CAN YOU PLESE CHECK IF I DID IT CORRECTLY. AND HELP ME WITH ANY MISTAKES I HAVE OR HELP ME FIX IT. THANK YOU.

You are asked to write a 1 - 2 pageS summary of one of the articles "Evaluation of family therapy NANNA NIELSEN"(ARTICLE SEE LINK : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tUu6PFeebC3DvAtP5MoSLJOfzZJkOvSWiAxDXfl74Bs/edit?usp=sharing). Your paper should focus on research design and data only.

The purpose of this paper is to showcase your understanding of how research methods and data serve to answer stated research question(s). Thus, your paper should focus on research design, methods, data and analysis of the original research presented in the article.

The paper needs to address the following:

1. Research problem
2. Prior deficiencies as described in the article
3. Significance of the study
4. Research question(s) and/or hypothesis(-es)
5. Research worldview
6. Research inquiry (qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods)
7. Type of research design (e.g. experiment, ethnography etc.). Is it longitudinal or cross-sectional research?
8. Research instrument(s) (e.g. survey, interview) and its characteristics (e.g. researcher developed its own instrument versus using established instruments).
9. Dependent and independent variables. How they are operationalized.
10. Validity and reliability.
11. Sample: size, selection, type, and characteristics
12. Ethical issues before, during and after conducting the study
13. Why researcher(s) selected this particular research design and sample.

This paper can be written in an essay format or you can address each of those points in separate paragraphs or points. Provide all the details.

Summary of "Evaluation of Family Therapy" by Nanna Nielsen

Research Problem

The study investigates the effects of family therapy on families where parents have mental disorders. It explores how family therapy influences the family climate and the well-being and development of children living with mentally disordered parents.

Prior Deficiencies

Previous research indicated that children of mentally disordered parents are at a higher risk of developing mental disorders and other problems. However, there was a lack of detailed understanding of how family interventions could mitigate these risks.

Significance of the Study

This study is significant as it addresses the gap in knowledge regarding the positive impact of family therapy on the family environment and the psychological health of children in families affected by parental mental disorders. It aims to provide empirical evidence on the benefits of family therapy, which can inform clinical practices and therapeutic approaches.

Research Questions/Hypotheses

The primary research question is: Does family therapy positively influence the family climate and the well-being and development of children with mentally disordered parents?

Research Worldview

The study adopts a post-positivist worldview, focusing on measuring and analyzing the impact of family therapy through quantitative methods.

Research Inquiry

This is a quantitative study as it employs statistical analysis to evaluate the effects of family therapy.

Research Design

The research design is a longitudinal study, tracking changes in family climate and the well-being of children over time. The study involves pre- and post-intervention assessments to measure the impact of family therapy.

Research Instruments

The primary instrument used is the Family Environment Scale (FES), a well-established self-rating questionnaire that measures various aspects of the family environment, including cohesion, expressiveness, and conflict. The FES has been validated in numerous studies and is known for its reliability and consistency.

Dependent and Independent Variables

• Independent Variable: Participation in family therapy.
• Dependent Variables: Family climate (measured by FES), well-being, and development of children. The variables are operationalized through the FES scores, which provide a quantitative measure of the family environment.

Validity and Reliability

The FES is a validated instrument with high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 for different subscales. The study's longitudinal design enhances its validity by allowing the researchers to observe changes over time.

Sample

The study included 58 families, with 31 families completing the study. The sample was selected from families attending an outpatient psychiatric ward in Copenhagen, Denmark. The families had children younger than 18 years living at home and at least one parent with a diagnosed mental disorder. The sample included a mix of single-parent and two-parent families, with children ranging from 0 to 18 years old.

Ethical Issues

The study adhered to ethical standards, ensuring informed consent from all participants. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the study, and participants were free to withdraw at any time without any repercussions. Ethical considerations also included the psychological well-being of participants, with therapeutic support provided as needed.

Rationale for Research Design and Sample

The longitudinal design was chosen to capture the effects of family therapy over time, providing a comprehensive view of its impact. The sample was selected to represent a diverse range of families affected by parental mental disorders, ensuring the findings would be applicable to a broad population.

Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using statistical methods to compare pre- and post-intervention FES scores. The analysis aimed to determine the significance of changes in the family environment and the well-being of children.

In summary, this study employed a rigorous quantitative approach to evaluate the impact of family therapy on families with mentally disordered parents. Through the use of validated instruments and a longitudinal design, it provides valuable insights into the potential benefits of family therapy for improving family dynamics and supporting children's development.