Hello,

Please assist with you assignment below:

The case Masterpiece Cakeshop, LTD. and Jack C. Phillips v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission went before the U.S. Supreme Court to address the question of whether a cake shop is allowed to refuse service to a customer because the cake shop owner felt that making the cake violated his religious beliefs. For this assignment, please locate these two merits briefs filed in this case: the brief of petitioner, Masterpiece Cakeshop; and the brief of respondents, David Mullins and Charlie Craig.

How does each party presented the facts and the underlying issues for their case? What's persuasive techniques usedwhat facts did each side choose to highlight? How did each side present potentially unfavorable facts?

In addition, explain the difference between persuasive and predictive legal writing. Use the Masterpiece Cakeshop briefs to provide examples. How did they organize their question presented and facts in order to persuade the reader? What are two tips that were used and explain the techniques for persuasive legal writing. What comments or questions do you have about that shift from predictive to persuasive style?

Thank you,

Marj.