Here is my question, please answer them in YOUR OWN WORDS, I just post this question and got the same answer that my friend was written so please DONT COPY PASTE. THANK YOU. answer in at least 7-8 words

What does the general duty clause require?

What is the fine sufficient in this case?

Should the trainers at Sea World be protected from the whales by a physical barrier?

CHAPTER 20 Employment Law and Worker Protection 473 CASE 20.5 FEDERAL COURT CASE General Duty Standard SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. Perez, Secretary, United States Department of Labor 748 F.3d 1202, 2014 U.S. App. Lexis 6660 (2014) United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Facts a "The remedy imposed for Sea World's violations does not change the essential nature of its business." whales unless they are protected by physical barri- -Rogers, Circuit Judge ers or decking systems, and imposed a $12,000 fine. SeaWorld petitioned for review. Issue Sea World of Florida, LLC, operates a theme park in Did Sea World violate the general duty clause? Orlando, Florida, that is designed to entertain and edu- cate paying customers by displaying and studying marine Language of the Court animals. Dawn Brancheau, a 15-year veteran trainer at The remedy imposed for SeaWorld's violations SeaWorld, was interacting with Tilikum, a killer whale, does not change the essential nature of its busi- during a performance before an audience in a pool at Sea- ness. There will still be human interactions and World, when the killer whale grabbed her and refused to performances with killer whales; the remedy will release her. She suffered traumatic injuries and drowned. simply require that they continue with increased A customer had taken a video of the performance. safety measures. With distance and physical Although Brancheau was the only SeaWorld employee barriers betroeen Tilikum and trainers, Tilikum killed by an animal, Brancheau's death was the third can still perform almost the same behaviors fatality associated with Tilikum during a 30-year period. performed when no barriers were present. There are no specific duty standards regulating how trainers work with killer whales. The Secretary Decision of Labor issued citations to SeaWorld for violating the The U.S. court of appeals denied SeaWorld's petition general duty clause by exposing animal trainers to for review. the recognized hazard of injury or drowning when working with killer whales during performances and Critical Legal Thinking Questions training. The Secretary determined that SeaWorld What does the general duty clause require? Was the fine had violated the general duty standard, held that sufficient in this case? Will the barrier restrictions provide trainers should not be allowed any contact with killer sufficient safety for trainers