Here is my question. The answer needs to be at least 6-7 lines in your own words, please. Also attached is the picture of the page which will help you.

Please answer the following questions in complete sentences. Did Goodyear act ethically in this case? Do you think the amount of damages that will be awarded will prevent similar conduct in the future? CHAPTER 2 Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business CASE 2.2 U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE Nondisclosure of Evidence DIV Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Haeger 137 S.Ct. 117, 2017 U.S. Lexis 2613 (2017) Supreme Court of the United States "That uncertainty points toward demanding Issue do-over. Should the plaintiffs recover their entire lawyer's fees -Kagan, Justice of $2.7 million Facts Leroy, Donna, Barry, and Suzanne Haeger sued Language of the U.S. Supreme Court the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company to recover Goodyear, the U.S. district court found, had monetary damages for injuries they suffered after engaged in a years-long course of bad faith the family's motorhome swerved off the road and behavior. Here, the conduct arose to a truly flipped over. The plaintifis alleged that a Good egregious level. Federal courts possess the year G159 tire on the vehicle caused the accident ability to fashion an appropriate sanction for conduct tohich abuses the judicial process, because the tire was not designed to withstand the A sanctioning court must determine which level of heat generated when the tire was used on fees toere incurred because and solely a motorhome at highway speeds. Discovery in the because of the misconduet at issue. No such case lasted several years. The plaintiffs repeatedly finding lies behind the 82.7 million atoard demanded that Goodyear turn over internal test That uncertainty points toward demanding a results for the G159, but the company's responses do-ocer were both slow and unrevealing in content. The parties finally settled the case for an undisclosed Decision sum of money Later, the plaintiffs' lawyer learned that Good- The U.S. Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs can- year had disclosed a set of test results in another not automatically recover the entire lawyer's fees case that had not been disclosed to the plaintiffs they spent on the case but can recover the amount that showed that the G159 tire got unusually hot of lawyer's fees caused by Goodyear's withholding of at speeds between 55 and 65 miles per hour. The evidence. The Supreme Court remanded the ense for plaintiffs sued Goodyear to recover their entire law- a determination of this amount. yer's fees of $2.7 million they expended on their case. The U.S. district court awarded the plain- tiffs this amount of damages, and the U.S. court of appeals affirmed the judgment. Goodyear appealed Critical Legal Thinking Questions to the U.S. Supreme Court, alleging that the award Did Goodyear act ethically in this case? Should the plaintiffs of lawyer's fees should not be the entire amount be awarded the entire amount they spent on lawyer's fees? expended by the plaintiffs, but should be limited to Do you think the amount of damages that will be awarded an amount determined to be related to Goodyear's will prevent similar conduct in the future? misconduct. Social Responsibility of Business 2.3 Describe and apply the theories of the social responsibility of business. Businesses do not operate in a vacuum. Decisions made by businesses have far reaching effects on society. In the past, many business decisions were based solely on a cost-benefit analysis and how they affected the bottom line. Such decisions, however, may cause negative externalities for others. Example The dumping of hazardous wastes from a manufacturing plant into a river affects the homeowners, farmers, and others who use the river's waters