Hey, can someone please help me with this practise assignment for 'Managing Performance & Rewards - MGMT3015?

ORGANISATION: JETSTAR

THE TWO REWARD & RECOGNITION PROGRAMS FOR JETSTAR: 'ACHIEVERS' & 'KUDOS'

(Just pretend that you've seen 2 group videos based on the two above rewards - write whatever)

Task Overview: The purpose of this assessment is to compare, critique and apply performance and reward theory to demonstrate your understanding of the theoretical concepts covered in this unit. Students are also asked to apply feedback techniques that enable 'receivers' to use corrective action to improve learning and knowledge in a progressive learning cycle Task instructions: 1. Students should review a range of video proposals from other organisations (this will allow you to explore and learn about other R&R programs and identify varying quality of video proposals). 2. Students will select two group videos chosen from the same organisation, but not your original organisation. Ensure that you select videos of different qualities. 3. Use the rubric (for assessment 1(a)) to assess the quality of video proposals. Do they meet the brief? 4. Explain and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of both video proposals. 5. Draw on P&R theory and use the STAR feedback framework to present your evidence and rational for your observations. Perhaps one video is 'stronger' that the other? 6. Finally, offer corrective action in the form of two recommendations only for the video that you consider to be weaker in quality.Introduction, body, conclusion, recommendation {two recommendations) Use headings where appropriate Include of 6 peer reviewed articles Use critical and analytical evaluation in the body of the report Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Fail Demonstrate application Demonstrate a high level of understanding in performance Demonstrate a good level of understanding in Demonstrate a general understanding of Occasionally demonstrating an Unable to demonstrate or Absent OR and alignment of & reward (P&R) knowledge and theory consistently P&R knowledge and theory throughout the P&R knowledge and theory at key points in the understanding of provides inaccurate explanations performance & reward throughout the presentation. Apply P&R concepts to Presentation. Applying P&R concepts to presentation. On occasion there is evidence of P&R knowledge and theory and applying of P&R knowledge, theory and Non- submission OR knowledge, concepts & clearly identify and comprehensively address challenges identify and address challenges and issues in anapplying P&R concepts to identify and address P&R concepts in an ad hoc manner concepts. Provides limited or no organizational context Student is found to have theory to support problem and issues in an organizational context. some of the challenges and issues in throughout the presentation. Including understanding of the plagiarised solving organizational context mention of the challenges and issues but not challenges/issues. fully addressing or offering a resolution of 40% the challenges/issues. Research reward & Evidence of research from a wide range of sources to Evidence of research from relevant sources Evidence of research from a few sources to create a Evidence of limited R&R research to There is NO evidence of research Absent OR recognition literature to create a presentation that to create a presentation that presentation that compares rather than evaluates create a presentation that mentioned some that is relevant to R&R literature. The provide logical business critically evaluatesrelevant reward & recognition critically evaluates R & R some aspects of R&R literature. Providing a evidence of the business need for a R&R presentation is unable to explain or Non- submission OR propositions that meet the (R&R) literature. Providing insightful and logical literature. Providing practical and logical general approach to identify business need of the platform. Limited reference to provides a business links to the Student is found to have needs of the organisation's business alignment to the cultural context of the business alignment to the cultural context of cultural context of the organization. understanding and aligning the needs of the cultural context of the organization. plagiarised culture organization the organization organisations' culture 40% Demonstrate effective use Demonstrates an extensive and Demonstrates an extensive knowledge of Demonstrates a good knowledge video techniques. Demonstrates a satisfactory knowledge of Unable to demonstrate a satisfactory Absent OR of appropriate video exceptional knowledge of video video techniques. Communicates a visual, Communicates a satisfactory and informative video techniques. Communicates a satisfactory videopresentation, provides little or techniques and online techniques. Communicates a highly visual, creative and informativepresentation that is presentation that is interesting and visual. Evidence presentation that meets the assessment no information relevant to Non- submission OR presentation & informativepresentation that is engaging, engaging and accessible, delivered in a of accessibility requirements and offers the basic visual assessment details. Presentation communication accessible, persuasive and delivered in a sequential sequential and logical manner. effects. Accessibility may not be included. Student is found to have does not meet the assessment Evidence of a recommendation requirements plagiarised and logical manner. Evidence of a recommendation Evidence of a recommendation Evidence of a recommendations No evidence of a recommendation 20%