Hi everyone, From a law office perspective, selecting and evaluating eDiscovery software isn't as straightforward as picking a tool that looks efficient on paper. There are real underlying issues that can complicate the entire process, and if those problems aren't addressed early, the software might create more headaches than it solves. The biggest challenges tend to revolve around three things: cost, competence, and compliance. Most offices underestimate how expensive and time-consuming eDiscovery tools can be, especially once you factor in user training and integration. ABA's duty of technological competence under Model Rule 1.1 adds another layer of complexity, since attorneys must understand how these systems work to manage electronically stored information ESI responsibly. If the team doesn't fully grasp the process of collection, review, and production, the software can become a liability instead of an asset. The growing volume of ESI makes that risk even higher, the more data, the more room for error or ethical missteps. Respond to this