How can I answer the following questions please?

Question 7 (1 point) Which statement best describes the law on standing to bring a claim in public nuisance? ( Any member of the public has standing to bring a claim in public nuisance. Standing is restricted to the Attorney General, or someone with the permission I of theAttorney General, except where an individual can show that they have suffered special damages beyond those suffered by the public at large. Because public nuisance claims involve pure ecological losses, only the Attorney General has standing to bring a claim. Question 8 (1 point) Which statement best describes the legal effect of the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Smith v. Inca on other Canadian courts: II: Because this case is a private law decision, it is binding on all Canadian courts. The decision has persuasive authority for the Supreme Court of Canada, but is ' binding on all other Canadian courts. '1: The decision is binding on co-equal or lower courts in Ontario. ("\"1 The decision has persuasive authority only because the holding in the decision is obiter dicta