How does the First Amendment bolster the web designer's stance in the $303$ Creative, LLC case? What implications does this case hold for any type of business?

In crafting your response, consider these inquiries: Has the U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court's decision in this case diminished the importance of gender identity, race, ethnicity, and other protected classifications as compelling interests of the government? Do you concur with the Court$$s ruling in favor of the web designer, particularly in relation to businesses that serve the public? Is there a boundary to the extent a business can refuse service based on personal beliefs? Could this decision potentially enable businesses to deny services to individuals based on differences in religious beliefs, skin color, or gender identity, such as in cases involving weddings of Jewish, Islamic, Pagan, or biracial couples?

Include considerations from related cases such as the Arlene's Flowers and Masterpiece Cakeshop decisions to enrich your analysis.