How effectively did the author argue their point(s) in this piece? Your focus will NOT be on
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
How effectively did the author argue their point(s) in this piece? Your focus will NOT be on the content, but instead on the rhetorical choices--the style, the technique, the moves--that the author used. (For instance, you might be 100% pro-immigration, but still feel like an author wrote a weak pro-immigration argument because they slipped into logical fallacies or had a bad balance of ethos/pathos/logos.) I'd like you to incorporate several concepts from the list below as you respond, demonstrating to me that you're synthesizing the ideas we've been covering.
- Bloom's Taxonomy (with a focus on the top 3 tiers, considered the "critical thinking tiers")
- Ethos/pathos/logos
- Logical Fallacies
- Inference
- Definition
- Assumption
- Taste
- Values
This is my article: What Economists Think About Immigration Doesn't Really Matter
Dec. 17, 2021 By Peter Coy (Opinion Writer)
Related Book For
Posted Date: