How would a Constitutional Convention delegate from a slave$-$holding state, such as South Carolina, have characterized the Three$-$Fifths Compromise?

$"$It is a reasonable agreement that gives my state more power in Congress than if enslaved people were not counted."

$"$It is an outrage to suggest that the interests of enslaved people can be represented by their enslavers."

$"$It is acceptable because it provides each state equal representation in one chamber of Congress."

$"$It is an unjustified abuse of governmental power which will likely harm my state's economy."