https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VNZlThwUApK8YDssw0PaYuQJGHf1dFDfxAtl_9XyVuY/edit?usp=sharing

Using this link help me with my FA3 assignment

Here is the Rubric and the ratings I got. Follow the rubric criteria. currently the paper is 1500 words and with each revision 2 00 words should be added resulting in 17 00 words or 19 00 words. The paper is about Biology at California state University Sacramento. and is in the perspective of student guide.

Here is an introduction example of student guide- Are you thinking about getting a Liberal Studies degree? You're not alone. Successful teachers, politicians, business people, lawyers, etc. have started their careers with a bachelor of arts in Liberal Studies. First of all, what exactly is Liberal Studies? "Liberal studies programs provide students with the tools and skills to be critical and creative thinkers, researchers, and communicators in almost any field." Students who choose a Liberal studies degree will gain a broader picture of the intricacies of individuals and groups in areas like "psychology, language, culture, and beyond". After investigating various subjects, students will choose to focus on one area for professional development ("What is Liberal Studies?").

Do you want to know more about this major? In this student guide, you will take a closer look at the Liberal Studies major overall and Sacramento State University's program more specifically, exploring academic degrees, coursework, internships, academic support, networking opportunities, and more. By the end, you'll be ready to make an informed decision about whether the Liberal Studies major at Sacramento State is for you.E5 FA3 Paper Completed Draft Rubric Sp24

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. STOP! IS YOUR FA3 ELIGIBLE FOR GRADING??

0 pts NO! NOT Eligible for grading-Doesn't meet basic requirements The paper is NOT ELIGIBLE for grading because it is missing one or more of the following requirements: 1. WORD COUNT of 15 00 or more is not met 2. REVISION is not done or is not significant since the rough draft. The paper does not show work has been done and/or the paper has not increased by 20 0 words or more. 3. FOUR SOURCES are not used and clearly cited in the paper. 4. WORKS CITED PAGE containing all sources of information used in the paper. 5. SUBMISSION is not done properly in Google Docs and/or Canvas.

0 pts YES! Meets Eligibility Requirements for Grading

0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Revision & Improvement Since the Previous Draft

10 to >8.75 pts Excellent The paper shows extensive work throughout the document since the rough draft. Additions are made in most areas of the paper, and there may be changes, moved items, and deletions as well. It's easy to see the writer has made revision efforts. At least 500 words have been added since the rough draft.

8.75 to >8.0 pts Strong The paper shows work since the rough draft. Additions are made in more than half the areas of the paper, and there may be changes, moved items, and deletions as well. It's easy to see the writer has made revision efforts. At least 400 words have been added since the rough draft.

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient The paper shows some work since the rough draft. Additions are made in one or more areas of the paper, and there may be changes, moved items, and deletions as well. It is clear that the writer has made revision efforts. At least 200 words have been added since the rough draft.

7 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient The paper shows little work and very few changes since the rough draft. Additions are not made in most areas of the paper. There may be few changes, moved items, or deletions. It's hard to see that the writer has made revision efforts. Fewer than 200 words have been added since the rough draft.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. The Rhetorical Situation: Purpose, Audience & Genre

7 to >6.3 pts Excellent GENRE: It is easy to see which genre the paper is written in - a traditional research paper or a student guide. The paper follows MLA guidelines. AUDIENCE: A clear understanding of the target audience is evident throughout the paper. There is sufficient analysis, examples, and explanations to engage the audience effectively. The tone, vocabulary format, headings, and images are consistent and appropriate and reflect awareness of the audience's needs.

6.3 to >5.6 pts Strong GENRE: It is possible to determine which genre the paper is written in - a traditional research paper or a student guide. The paper follows MLA guidelines. AUDIENCE: Some understanding of the target audience is evident throughout the paper. There are analyses, examples, and explanations intended to engage the audience. The tone, vocabulary format, headings, and images are mostly appropriate and reflect awareness of the audience's needs.

5.6 to >4.9 pts Proficient GENRE: The paper somewhat follows either a traditional research paper or a student guide format with occasional issues. MLA guidelines are followed but may have some inconsistencies. AUDIENCE: The paper shows some understanding of the target audience. While the introduction and conclusion have clear audience awareness, the body may lack audience consistency. The tone, vocabulary format, headings, and images reflect some awareness of the audience's needs, with occasional lapses.

4.9 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient GENRE: The genre of the writing is not clear. The paper format somewhat follows MLA guidelines but may have some inconsistencies. AUDIENCE: The paper shows little understanding of the target audience. The tone, vocabulary format, headings and images do not reflect awareness of the reader's needs,

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Prompt Section 1. An overall description of the major, what it is, why it is important, and the basic information about the field college students need to know like hiring and earning projections, tasks and duties, etc.

10 to >8.75 pts Excellent Provides a comprehensive overview, addressing important key aspects with depth and insight. Source support, visual support, and development are effective and consistent throughout.

8.75 to >8.0 pts Strong Presents a clear overview covering or mentioning key aspects. Source support, visual support, and development of ideas are adequate throughout.

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Offers an overview, but it may lack depth of key aspects. Source support or visual support may be inconsistent.

7 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient Offers limited/superficial information about the major, missing key aspects. Source support and/or visual support are missing or inadequate.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5. Prompt Section 2:A description of two or more field-specific topics such as new developments, new discoveries, and/or research findings important to graduates and professionals in the field and how these topics relate to college students and their studies.

10 to >8.75 pts Excellent Two or more relevant field-specific topics are competently and clearly discussed in the paper. The topics are well-explained and effective connections are made between them and college students' coursework. Source support and idea development are evident and consistent throughout.

8.75 to >8.0 pts Strong Two relevant field-specific topics are discussed clearly in the paper. The topics are explained, and connections are made between them and college students' coursework. Source support and idea development are evident throughout.

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Two field-specific topics are covered in the paper. The topics are somewhat explained but may lack depth of key aspects. Connections made between the topics and college students' coursework/studies are included but may be inconsistent. Source support and idea development may be vague or spotty but are attempted.

7 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient Only one of the relevant field-specific topics is covered, OR two field related topics are mentioned minimally in the paper. The topics are not well explained and lack many key aspects. No connections are made between the topics and college students' coursework/studies. Source support may be missing, and development is weak or incomplete.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome6. Prompt Section 3: A thorough report of the following five offerings at CSUS for your major: Undergraduate degrees, minors, and certificates the major offers.The courses (coursework) required for these academic degrees and certificates and examples. Department or College Internships, Fellowships, & Other Academic Experiences Academic support services and resources in your department/college like tutoring, advising, and workshops Clubs, Professional Organizations, or Networking Groups and Events at CSUS for your major

10 to >8.75 pts Excellent Provides a comprehensive discussion, clearly addressing all five CSUS offerings with depth and insight. Source support, visual support, and idea development are effective and consistent throughout.

8.75 to >8.0 pts Strong Provides a clear discussion, adequately addressing all five CSUS offerings with some depth. Source support, visual support, and idea development are used throughout.

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Offers an overview, that includes at least 4 of the 5 CSUS offerings, but it may lack depth of key aspects. Source support or visual support may be inconsistent.

7 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient Offers limited superficial information about the CSUS offerings and may be missing key aspects. Source support and/or visual support are missing or inadequate.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome7. Prompt Section 4: A thorough assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the five CSUS major offerings, and why this is important for students to know.Undergraduate degrees, minors, and certificates the major offers. The courses (coursework) required for these academic degrees and certificates and examples. Department or College Internships, Fellowships, & Other Academic Experiences Academic support services and resources in your department/college like tutoring, advising, and workshops Clubs, Professional Organizations, or Networking Groups and Events at CSUS for your major

10 to >8.75 pts Excellent Provides a comprehensive discussion of the advantages and disadvantages with depth and insight, The discussion includes all five CSUS offerings and more. There is a distinction between what the major's program/department offers and what the wider CSUS university offers. Clear claims, analysis, and idea development are effective and consistent throughout.

8.75 to >8.0 pts Strong Provides a clear discussion of the advantages and disadvantages with some depth, The discussion includes all five CSUS offerings and possibly more. There is a distinction between what the major's program/department offers and what the wider CSUS university offers. The paper includes claims, analysis, and idea development throughout.

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Provides a basic discussion of the advantages and disadvantages with some depth, The discussion includes at least 4 of the 5 CSUS offerings and possibly more. The distinction between what the major's program/department offers and what the wider CSUS university offers may be vague or missing. The paper includes claims, analysis, and idea development but they may be vague or inconsistent throughout.

7 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient Mentions minimally the advantages and disadvantages but may skip some of the CSUS offerings. There is not a distinction between what the major's program/department offers and what the wider CSUS university offers. The paper may be missing claims, analysis, and idea development or it may be inadequate throughout.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome8. M LA In-Text Citation of Information

8 to >7.2 pts Excellent Uses MLA format correctly for all in-text citations, providing accurate and consistent citations throughout for quotes, paraphrases, and summaries. The citations may be narrative lead-ins and/or parenthetical citations.

7.2 to >6.4 pts Strong Mostly uses MLA format correctly, with minor errors. Uses accurate citations throughout for quotes, paraphrases, and summaries. The citations may be narrative lead-ins and/or parenthetical citations.

6.4 to >5.6 pts Proficient Uses MLA format adequately most of the time, but in-text citations for quotes, paraphrases, and summaries may have some inconsistencies or small errors. The citations may be narrative lead-ins and/or parenthetical citations.

5.6 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient The paper does not use MLA in-text citations adequately. Citations are missing or done incorrectly.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome9. Source Support to Back Up Claims, Arguments, & Reported Information whether quotes, paraphrases or summaries.

8 to >7.2 pts Exellent The paper smoothly integrates SIX or more sources that meet the credibility criteria for this assignment and at least one is a scholarly peer-reviewed article. The paper may use additional sources too. All sources are relevant and effectively back up and support arguments, reported information, and claims. Every quote, paraphrase, or summary is supported by a source.

7.2 to >7.0 pts Strong The paper clearly uses SIX or more sources that meet the credibility criteria for this assignment and at least one is a scholarly peer-reviewed article. The paper may use additional sources too. Most sources are relevant and back up and support arguments, reported information, and claims. All quotes, paraphrases, or summaries are supported by a source.

7 to >5.6 pts Proficient Use of at least FOUR credible sources is evident, one of which might be a scholarly peer-reviewed article. The paper may use additional sources too. Most quotes, paraphrases, or summaries are supported by a source. However, the paper may lack source support for some arguments, reported information, and claims.

5.6 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient The paper does not use or integrate at least four relevant and credible sources. Many arguments, reported information, and claims are not supported by sources.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome10. Use of Educational Images

7 to >6.3 pts Excellent Effectively integrates SIX or more educational images to illustrate information discussed throughout the paper. The images are numbered, titled, and cited consistently and correctly using MLA.

6.3 to >5.6 pts Strong Utilizes FIVE or more educational images adequately, providing visual support for concepts in some areas of the paper. The images are numbered, titled, and cited but may contain minimal errors.

5.6 to >4.9 pts Proficient Utilizes FOUR or more images, but they may lack educational clarity or relevance. The images may lack figure numbers or titles but citation is attempted.

4.9 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient May include THREE or fewer images. Or may not effectively utilize educational images. Or may consistently be missing numbers, titles, or citations of images.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome11. M LA Works Cited Page

7 to >6.3 pts Excellent The paper's works cited page follows M LA guidelines. It begins at the top of the last page with the title "Works Cited". It includes all sources used in the paper and NOT sources not used in the paper. Each source citation is formatted in alphabetical order with hanging indentation and includes required bibliographic information for the source type.

6.3 to >5.6 pts Strong The paper's works cited page follows M LA guidelines. It begins at the top of the last page with the title "Works Cited". It includes all sources used in the paper and NOT sources not used in the paper. Each source citation is formatted in alphabetical order with hanging indentation and includes required bibliographic information for the source type. There are few errors or inconsistencies.

5.6 to >4.9 pts Proficient The paper's works cited page follows ML A guidelines to some extent. It may not begin at the top of the last page, or may not have the title "Works Cited". It includes all sources used in the paper and NOT sources not used in the paper. There may be minor issues with formatting in alphabetical order or hanging indentation. The citations might not contain all of the required bibliographic information for the source type.

4.9 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient The paper's works cited page does not follow ML A guidelines. It may not begin at the top of the last page, and it may not have the title "Works Cited". OR it does not include all sources used in the paper OR might include sources not used in the paper. OR there may be pervasive issues with formatting in alphabetical order or hanging indentation. OR The citations might be URLS or links only and not contain the required bibliographic information for their source type.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome12. Organization, Flow of Ideas & Paragraphing

7 to >6.3 pts Excellent The paper is organized logically and maintains a smooth flow of ideas throughout the paper. There is a definite delineation of introduction, body, and conclusion. Paragraphing is excellent with focused topic sentences, coherent development of ideas, and transitions. Each paragraph contributes effectively to the overall flow and organization of the paper. Transitions and connections between paragraphs are effective and consistent.

6.3 to >5.6 pts Strong The paper is organized well and maintains a clear flow of ideas throughout the paper. It is easy to see where the introduction, body, and conclusion begin and end. Paragraphing is clear with focused topic sentences, development of ideas, and transitions. Each paragraph contributes to the overall flow and organization of the paper. Transitions and connections between paragraphs are effective.

5.6 to >4.9 pts Proficient The paper has some organization and flow, but the order of ideas may not make sense in some spots. The distinction between the introduction body, and conclusion may need work. Paragraphing is somewhat effective but there may be large blocks of writing that should be paragraphed or there may be too many small paragraphs that could be combined. There is an attempt at topic sentences and adequate development of ideas. Transitions and connections between paragraphs may be inconsistent or unclear.

4.9 to >0 pts Not Yet Proficient The paper is not well organized. Parts of the paper may be missing or hard to identify. The ideas do not flow together smoothly. Paragraphing is inconsistent or lacking in structure, with unclear or missing topic sentences and minimal development of ideas. OR paragraphs may have multiple main ideas pushed together in one block of writing. Transitions and connections between paragraphs are inadequate or missing.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome13. Use of Headings & Subheadings

6 pts Strong Has both headings and subheadings used in a clear and effective way for the intended audience throughout the paper

5 pts Proficient Has only headings or uses headings and some subheadings in the paper. There is a clear attempt to help the reader. but there may be inconsistencies.

4 pts Proficient There are headings and/or subheadings in some parts of the paper but they may be confusing and inconsistent in some areas.

0 pts Not Proficient There are few or no headings or subheadings used in the paper

6 pts