https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/us-should-adopt-right-be-forgotten-online QUESTION: (open the link) apply them to your analysis of one of the IQ2 debate linked above This is a test to see how you can apply the theory/tips in analyzing a debate. Give explanation and examples to support your evaluations. Address the following in your analysis: 1. Debate Concepts: Explain how each side was more or less effective in terms of the debate concepts covered in the chapters on Debate in your Reader. For example: Proposition: What does the proposition mean? How was it defined and were there any problems with clear and common understanding of what was being debated? Introduction/Conclusion: How well did each speaker achieve the goals for the psychological/logical orientation and closure for each speech? Fact/Value and Policy Issues: (*Note that debaters do not use the formal structure/terminology of academic debate so you have to identify the elements yourself) What criteria (metrics) were used in the debate? What value and fact claims were critical to deciding the debate? How well did the AFF prove and OPP challenge issues of Harms, Inherency, Plan, Solvency? What Disadvantages were brought up by Opp? Clash/Rebuttal: which refutations strategies were used and how well did each side directly clash with the opposing side's points? Cross-Exam/Questions: if questions were allowed, how well were they used to challenge the opposing side? Evaluate the responses to the questions asked by the audience and/or opponents. 2. Reasoning/Organization: Summarize the basic argument on each side in a few sentences. Were you able to follow the logic from the claims to the conclusion? What were the weaknesses in the reasoning? How well did the speakers communicate the organization of their points through various strategies such as previewing/reviewing, transitions phrases, catchy tag lines, non-verbal cues, etc? 3. **Evidence**: Assess the types of support used and how effectively they were applied based on the materials from your Reader. What should have been used but was not? Statistics Facts Testimonials/authoritative citations Narratives Relatable, specific examples Analogies/Comparisons 4. Style: Delivery: Effectiveness of the debaters in terms of their use of vocal qualities, body, eye contact, facial expression, and personal appearance. Language: how did each side use language to help or hurt their presentation? Audience Adaptation: How did the speakers adapt their presentations to the audience? 5. Overall, what made each side more or less persuasive and why