https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/collins-v-godefroy.php

Suppose Simon has a contract to work for all of 2018 for 37 hours per week for a set wage. If Simon is offered $1000 more to work 1 hour extra per week O there is a contract, because even applying Stilk v Myrick there is consideration, as Simon has exceeded his duty O there is no consideration, as Simon is merely promising to perform his duty O there is a contract, as there are practical benefits O None of the above D Question 9 1 pts Read the link attached https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/collins-v-godefroy.phpc In Collins v Godefroy, the court said O the witness has provided consideration, by going to court O the witness has provided consideration, by giving a practical benefit to the other party O none of the above O the witness had provided no consideration, as providing honest evidence in court is a public duty