Human capacities for collective action often allow us to overrule evolutionary tendencies that predominate in other animals. Imagine that in a human population playing the Hawk Dove Game, a law was proposed outlawing playing Hawk, its approval being dependent on majority vote (and its cost of implementation assumed to be zero). Assume that player-voters are initially distributed according to the equilibrium frequency of Hawks, WC, and can change their strategy in response eitherto the law or (within the limits set by the law) to differential payoffs. Would a majority of the population support the proposed law? Explain why or why not. If passage required unanimity, would the law pass