I am going to post this question again because I need a more explanation. I need big answer for this question. Thank you.

While crossing the street together, Mr. Arsenovski was struck by a vehicle, knocking him and his wife to the street. The Arsenovskis, having recently immigrated to Canada, were unable to communicate in English. Mrs. Arsenovski filed a report of the injury to ICBC. She then experienced the wrath of ICBC and its special investigator, Mr. Gould. Gould submitted a report to Crown counsel recommending that Mrs. Arsenovski be charged with fraud under the Criminal Code, and that both Arsenovskis be charged with making a false statement contrary to section 42 of the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act of B.C.; Mrs. Arsenovski was so charged. Gould did not have objectively reasonable grounds for believing that Mrs. Arsenovski had committed an offence but was motivated to dissuade civil claims against ICBC. The criminal charge against Mrs. Arsenovski was only stayed on the day of the criminal trial, but by then, Mrs. Arsenovski suffered serious distress. What claims can Mrs. Arsenovski bring against Gould and ICBC? Are punitive damages likely? What other damages can be pursued in these circumstances