I cannot seem to get this right, please help I am lost

Past records suggest that the mean annual income, Ilir of teachers in state of Connecticut is less than or equal to the mean annual income, Ilor of teachers in California. In a current study, a random sample of 1) teachers from Connecticut and an independent random sample of 15 teachers from California have been asked to report their mean annual income. The data obtained are as follows: Annual income in dollars Connecticut| 57453, 46983, 52901, 44504, 52906, 50932, 49850, 38340, 51774, 49348, 49200, 39218, 43345, 38577, 47804 California 47981, 37454, 39309, 53320, 48503, 54670, 49167, 57493, 53698, 52874, 45854, 53628, 43647, 54134, 36919 Sand data DO ENDe The population standard deviation for mean annual income of teachers in Connecticut and in California are estimated as 6300 and 6100, respectively. It is also known that both populations are approximately normally distributed. At the 0.05 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to reject the claim that the Then fill in the table below. mean annual income of teachers in state of Connecticut is less than or equal to the mean annual income of teachers in California? Perform a one-tailed test. Carry your intermediate computations to at least three decimal places and round your answers as specified in the table. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.) The null hypothesis: H :I LL P x p The alternate hypothesis: H :0 nL Do 1=00=0 0=0 The type of test statistic: [Choose one) The value of the test statistic: Round to at least three X ? decimal places.) The p-value: Round to at least three decimal places.) Can we reject the claim that the mean annual income of teachers from Connecticut is less than or equal to the mean annual income of teachers O Yes O No from California