I do not need explanations. I need only the answers as soon as possible. These questions might be easy for you, but not for me. Thank you so much for helping me. And I really need your help.

1.The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is made applicable to the states

1. through the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment
2. through the Tenth Amendment
3. through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
4. the Sixth Amendment does not apply to the states because of federalism
5. through the Fifth amendment

2.A challenge to a state law treating 1 class of citizens differently than another would be made

1. based on the due process clause of the 5th amendment
2. based on the full faith and credit clause
3. based on the supremacy clause
4. based on the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment
5. based on the necessary and proper clause

3.SpawnSanto Corporation has been criminally charged with corporate fraud and a representative must appear in court to testify on behalf of the corporation. The representative wants to assert the 5thamendment privilege against self-incrimination.

This will

1. Be allowed, because corporations are people too
2. Not be allowed because the 5th amendment privilege can only be asserted by individuals
3. Not be allowed because of the privileges and immunities clause
4. Be allowed, but only if the corporation agrees
5. Be allowed if SpawnSanto made a large campaign contribution to the judge

4.A Texas resident challenging the fact that Harvard charges more tuition for out of state residents than it charges for residents of Massachusetts would

a. Win because tuition substantially affects commerce

b. Lose because the state of Texas has no rights in Massachusetts under the concept of federalism

c. Lose because the privileges and immunities clause does not apply if there is a good reason to treat non residents differently

d. Lose because the full faith and credit clause does not apply if there is a good reason to treat non residents differently

e. Win because a Texas resident ALWAYS wins when he sues a Yankee in Texas state court

5.Jay and Silent Bob are driving through Plano observing the speed limit, and obeying all traffic laws. Neither has been drinking. An officer pulls the car over, and asks Jay for permission to search the car. Jay declines permission, but the officer searches anyway. During the search, he tears out the back seat, rips up the carpet, and breaks open the trunk with a sledge hammer. The officer admits that he had no reason for doing so other than the fact that he hates the Jay and Silent Bob movies.

Which amendment(s) to the United States Constitution may be implicated?

1. the Second Amendment
2. the Tenth Amendment
3. the First and Ninth Amendments
4. the First and Tenth Amendments
5. the Fourth Amendment