i have performed a map gap analysis for part 2, i am unsure on how to rewrite the quality policy, as i was wonder it i would be possible for provide a more detailed description of what i need to do for each question as i am very unsure how to go about it

ASSESSMENT NO. 1 QUT ASSIGNMENT EXTENSION POLICY AND PROCEDURES WILL APPLY. WORD COUNT - 2,500 MAX. (EXCLUDING ALL REFERENCES AND APPENDICES) WEIGHTING - 25% OF UNIT TOTAL MARKS TYPE OF ASSESSMENT - INDIVIDUAL DUE DATE - Sunday, 19 April 2020 (11:59PM) Based on the Quality Tool Inc. (QTI) Case Study Company 1. Review the Quality Manual and documents provided to you on Blackboard. 2. Comment on the level of compliance with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015. If you identify any areas that do not comply with the standard, state your reasons for this conclusion. (NOTE: This should also include major areas of ISO 9001: 2015 on which the Quality Manual is silent). 3. Specifically, for QTI's Quality Policy and Strategic Direction (Page 16) detail how it could be improved. (Your answer should include an improved rewritten version that addresses the requirements of ISO 9001:2015). 4. Identify the stakeholders of QTI. For each stakeholder list their main points of interest. Detail how QTI could engage with and manage each stakeholder and their interests. Detail the measurable objectives that could be adopted by QTI. The measurable objectives you choose must; a. Be compliant with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 b. Facilitate improvement of QTI's products and services. 6. Examine the CAR - Corrective Action Request (F-1020-00) on page 41 of the QTI Documented Information and describe how you think this could be used. Having read the ISO9001:2015 Standard, can you describe a better way to raise Corrective Actions' or could you improve the F-1929-00 form in any way? ASSESSMENT NO. 1 QUT ASSIGNMENT EXTENSION POLICY AND PROCEDURES WILL APPLY. WORD COUNT - 2,500 MAX. (EXCLUDING ALL REFERENCES AND APPENDICES) WEIGHTING - 25% OF UNIT TOTAL MARKS TYPE OF ASSESSMENT - INDIVIDUAL DUE DATE - Sunday, 19 April 2020 (11:59PM) Based on the Quality Tool Inc. (QTI) Case Study Company 1. Review the Quality Manual and documents provided to you on Blackboard. 2. Comment on the level of compliance with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015. If you identify any areas that do not comply with the standard, state your reasons for this conclusion. (NOTE: This should also include major areas of ISO 9001: 2015 on which the Quality Manual is silent). 3. Specifically, for QTI's Quality Policy and Strategic Direction (Page 16) detail how it could be improved. (Your answer should include an improved rewritten version that addresses the requirements of ISO 9001:2015). 4. Identify the stakeholders of QTI. For each stakeholder list their main points of interest. Detail how QTI could engage with and manage each stakeholder and their interests. Detail the measurable objectives that could be adopted by QTI. The measurable objectives you choose must; a. Be compliant with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 b. Facilitate improvement of QTI's products and services. 6. Examine the CAR - Corrective Action Request (F-1020-00) on page 41 of the QTI Documented Information and describe how you think this could be used. Having read the ISO9001:2015 Standard, can you describe a better way to raise Corrective Actions' or could you improve the F-1929-00 form in any way