Question: I have secondary data on doctor mistakes (outcome variable) for all 50 states in USA by doctor specialty. I mean real numbers per state. I
I have secondary data on doctor mistakes (outcome variable) for all 50 states in USA by doctor specialty. I mean real numbers per state. I want to assess the relationship between doctor mistakes (outcome variable) and state of doctor practice (predictor #1) and doctor specialty (Predictor #2) (internist, Surgeon and OBGYN).I want to adjust for the following confounders: provider factor, hospital factor, patient factor and miscellaneous factor. I have simulated data for these 4 confounders.
Hypotheses:
1. no association or interaction between doctor mistake and state of doctor practice
2. no association or interaction between doctor mistake and doctor specialty
I want to do 2-way ANOVA using SPSS and my Excel table currently looks like this (other states not shown here. I will complete the homework by myself. I just need a guide. This is the reason for this question)
| State | Doctor Specialty | Doctor Mistake |
| Alabama | Internist | 100 |
| Alabama | Surgeon | 345 |
| Alabama | OBGYN | 502 |
| Alaska | Internist | 270 |
| Alaska | Surgeon | 150 |
| Alaska | OBGYN | 39 |
Question:
List all facts and essential information that must be contained in doctoral-level research after completing 2-way ANOVA (ANCOVA) in SPSS for clarity, credibility, and comprehension:
- Report/discussion/interpretation: What information must be here after completing 2-way ANOVA (ANCOVA)?
- Conclusion: What information must be here after completing 2-way ANOVA (ANCOVA)?
- Recommendation for future research: What information must be here after completing 2-way ANOVA (ANCOVA)?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
