I have the basic purpose of this study below; however, I am having trouble analyzing the results or interpreting it as I am new to statistics. And I don't know what degree of freedom means.

The present experiment is trying to determine both if non-words were made to look like real word primes people to recognize real words and if this is affected by delay time. Therefore, the hypothesis would be that "non-words that look moresimilar to real words have a stronger priming effect" and "longer delays reduce the effectiveness of the priming effect." The null hypothesis then would be that there be no effect between non-words that look more similar to real words on priming effect.

Word relationship (related/unrelated)

p value = 0.390 - degree of freedom 1

Interstimulus interval -

p value = 0.400 - Degree of freedom 2

Interaction world relationship and interstimulus interval - p value = 0.372

Degree of freedom 2

N=52

Related Word_300 (millisecond) interval

MEAN = 0.7744423

SD= 0 .63487315

Related Word_600 (millisecond) interval

MEAN = 4.6985958

STANDARD DEVIATION = 28.56566364

Related Word_900 (millisecond) interval

MEAN = 0.7903242

SD= 0 .67325493

Unrelated Word_300 interval

MEAN = 1.4075585

SD= 5.14511338

Unrelated Word_600 interval

MEAN = 0 .8915963

SD = 0 .96415566

Unrelated Word_900 interval

MEAN = 1.2306671

SD = 1.8968128

9 A A Aa A AL AaBbCCD AaBbCcD AaBbCc AaBbCct AaB OFin ab x, x A A 1 Normal 1 No Spac... Heading 1 . Heading 2 Title Sec Re Se Font Paragraph Styles Edi UT O 4.5 Mean Lexical Decision Time (msec) 3.5 2.5 Plot Area N 1.5 0.5 0 I I Related, 300 Related, 600 Related, 900 Unrelated, 300 Unrelated, 600 Unrelated, 900 Experimental Conditions (Word type + interstimulus interval)