Question: I nee E Corporate Finance#1 , Assignments > Applied Learning Assignment P... Applied Learning Assignment Part 2 New Attempt Submission Account Submitted! Due No Due

I nee

I nee E Corporate Finance#1 , Assignments >
E Corporate Finance#1 , Assignments > Applied Learning Assignment P... Applied Learning Assignment Part 2 New Attempt Submission Account Submitted! Due No Due Date Points 0 Submitting a file upload Oct 1 at 4:06am Dashboard Submission Details Download amazon 2.docx Courses Directions: Comments: No Comments Continue building on your final project by answering the following questions. Submit your responses to Calendar the Sections here when complete: Section 2: Analyze the major investment projects undertaken in the last five years. Provide relevant Inbox details (cost and brief description of the investment, type of securities issued, etc.). This section should be 625 words in length. History . Section 3: Evaluate the selected organization's current optimal financing mix (use of debt, common stock, and preferred shares). Provide relevant details regarding the cost of each financing option (i.e., cost of equity, cost of debt, cost of preferred shares), the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), Help and levered and unlevered betas. This section should be 625 words in length. To self-assess for this assignment: 1. Complete the assignment as described above. K 2. Use the assignment rubric to self-assess your work in this assignment. 1. Read through the rubric and evaluate your own work according to each of the following criteria. 2. Mark, in your own notes, the degree to which you think you meet the criteria. Assignment Rubric: Corporate Finance Expert Practitioner Apprentice Beginning The learner clearly The learner clearly The learner The learner is not demonstrates a marginally Financial sophisticated, critical demonstrates a well- demonstrates a able to demonstrate a critical and analysis developed, critical and thorough critical and and comprehensive substantial eport understanding of the substantia understanding of the understanding of the 60% of the firm's financial understanding of the firm's financial firm's financial final grade position and is fully position and is aware firm's financial position and is not aware of the position and is quite financial risks of the financial risks aware of the financial aware of the financial encountered in the risks encountered in encountered in the sector. risks encountered in the sector. sector. the sector. A high level of critical evaluation An effective level of A sufficient but limited level of Critical evaluation is and awareness of critical evaluation limited or lacks critical evaluation current problems, and awareness of and awareness of awareness of current and contemporary current problems and problems and ssues and debates current problems and contemporary issues contemporary issues contemporary issues Cognitive that draws on new and debates that and debates. and debates, with and insights or draws on new Insufficient reference some reference to intellectual perspectives within insights or new insights or made to new insights skills the field. Work perspectives within or perspectives demonstrates a the field. Work perspectives within within the field, or 10% of the significant level of the field. Limited demonstrates some insufficient evidence final grade evidence of originality and effective originality of originality and creativity in originality and and creativity in creativity in creativity in synthesizing current synthesizing current synthesizing current research and synthesizing current research and research and advanced scholarship within research and scholarship within scholarship within scholarship within the subject area the subject area. the subject area. the subject area Excellent Generally good presentation of work High quality presentation of work that is logically and presentation of work that is sufficiently coherently that is largely ogical and coherent Presentation of work logically and in structure with a shows insufficient structured with a coherently discernible central organization or Presentation, strong or original structured with a argument. May central argument, style and central argument(s), generally strong present limited and is lacking in structure conveyed with a high level of clarity central argument originality and lack logical and coherent 10% of the of expression and conveyed with a some clarity of structure. Poor clarity final grade clarity of expression expression, but an of expression weakly which clearly communicates valid, and which identifiable communicating to communicates clear conclusion specialist or non- coherent conclusions to conclusions to easonably specialist audiences. specialist and non- communicated to specialist and non- specialist audiences. specialist and non- specialist audiences. specialist audiences. Sufficient critical A good level of UCC Term 1 A high level of critical engagement engagement with a Insufficient critical easonable range of critical engagement across a good range Home elevant and current engagement with across an extensive of relevant and relevant and current Grades range of relevant current academic cademic, research, academic, research, Reading and and current policy- and practice research, policy- and policy- and practice- Units referencing related literature literature practice-related related literature. demonstrating 10% of the demonstrating wide literature Lack of evidence of mainly appropriate final grade and appropriate demonstrating wider reading or a reading but limited reading and initiative appropriate reading lack of initiative or along with highly initiative and/or and some initiative inconsistent and consistent accurate along with consistent some minor naccurate inconsistencies and referencing accurate referencing. inaccuracies in referencing referencing Application The learner is able to The learner is able to The learner is able to The learner is unable of critical effectively employ adequately employ marginally employ to employ critical thinking critical thinking in critical thinking in critical thinking in thinking in 10% of the formulating their formulating their ormulating their ormulating their final grade written response. written response. written response. written response. Previous Next >

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!