I need a different one please

here are the instructions:

Instructions Read these two articles on Trumps: Graham, What Trump Did in Osaka Was Worse Than Lying (The Atlantic) Yglesias, The Bul -in-Chief (Vox) Pick one of the highlighted examples from one of these sources that you believe is not a case of even though the author has identified it as . (a) Write an introduction that clearly states your thesis. That is, write an introduction that states specifically what position you are going to be defending in your paper. (b) In the first paragraph of the body of your paper, explain Henry Frankfurts basic analysis of . Identify each of the three necessary conditions for and explain each condition. Dont forget to illustrate Frankfurts analysis with an example. (c) Then write a paragraph explaining how differs from lying. You dont need to provide a full analysis of lying (of the sort you did in your analysis paper) to do this. Just focus on the specific differences between and lying. (d) For the final paragraph of the body of your paper, explain the example you selected and offer your reasons for thinking that, contrary to what the author says, the example is not actually a case of (in Frankfurts sense). Further, if you think that Trump is actually lying in the example, argue that he is; and if you think that Trump is not lying in the example, argue that he isnt. (e) Finish your paper draft with a conclusion that restates your thesis and offers an explanation for the authors mistake.

please make it fully allot of information cite and also make it in ur own words This is my final essay and want to pass the course