Question: I NEED A QUICK HELP PLEASE! The Six Sigma team has a specific focus on supporting management in choosing projects by developing a Grid matrix

I NEED A QUICK HELP PLEASE!
I NEED A QUICK HELP PLEASE! The Six Sigma team has a
specific focus on supporting management in choosing projects by developing a Grid
matrix that evaluates and ranks a list of projects based on a

The Six Sigma team has a specific focus on supporting management in choosing projects by developing a Grid matrix that evaluates and ranks a list of projects based on a set of weighted criteria. To initiate this process, the team identifies a list of criteria and assigns weights to each one. Subsequently, the team evaluates every project against these criteria. The criteria they identified are: 1. Degree of Strategic Alignment 2. Risk and Uncertainty 3. Potential for Long-Term Benefits 4. Complexity of the Project 5. Resources required (e.g., financial, HR) 6. Positive customer impact The Six Sigma team held a meeting with the management to discuss the importance of the selected criteria. The management's feedback indicated a strong emphasis on prioritizing long-term benefits and the positive customer impact. The strategic alignment of the project with the organization goals and the necessary resources required for its implementation were given moderate consideration. However, risk and complexity of the project did not appear to be of great importance to the management. Note that the level of importance score for the selected criteria is on a scale of 1 to 3 . A score of 3 indicates that the criterion is of utmost importance, while a score of 1 signifies that it is generally unimportant. A score of 2 denotes that the criterion is of moderate importance. After conducting a feasibility and profitability study, the team determined that the likelihood of success for the first and second projects did not exceed 85%. Despite incurring costs of 15,000KD and 22,000KD, respectively, these projects were only projected to yield savings of 165,000KD and 180,000KD. The estimated completion times for the first and second projects were three and two months, respectively. On the other hand, the third project had an 90% chance of success, and its estimated completion time was two months. Following their analysis, the team concluded that the third project was the most viable option. It was estimated to yield savings of 220,000 KD while costing 28,000KD 1. Complete the table below. ( 27 points) Managemeat Priority Level Project Name Strategic Alignment Pisk Benefits Compl Name 2. Select the best candidate(s). (3 poiats) 3. Based on your answer to the previous question and the information gathered by the Six Sigma team, select ONIY ONE project (10 points)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!