Question: I need help answering this multiple choice question. In a disparate impact case, the three part order of proof is as follows: the plaintiff must
I need help answering this multiple choice question.
- In a disparate impact case, the three part order of proof is as follows:
- the plaintiff must prove that a facially neutral practice disproportionately discriminated against a protected class; the defendant must articulate a business necessity; the plaintiff must prove that an alternative exists.
- the plaintiff must prove that a facially neutral practice disproportionately discriminated against a protected class; the defendant must prove business necessity; the plaintiff must prove that an alternative exists.
- the plaintiff must prove that a facially neutral practice disproportionately discriminated against a protected class; the defendant must articulate a nondiscriminatory reason; the plaintiff must prove that an alternative exists.
- the plaintiff must prove that a facially neutral practice disproportionately discriminated against a protected class; the defendant must prove it was motivated by a nondiscriminatory reason; the plaintiff must prove that an alternative exists.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
Study Help