I need help in reforming the paragraph below if it is comprehensible or not:

"Although the US's foreign policy demonstrates a clear realist agenda, interventions in other countries are justified as being for the greater benefit of humanity since the US is spreading democracy. Whether this is true or not, there is some evidence that interventions have had a beneficial effect, such as in Kuwait, Panama, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Liberals such as Kant would argue that "democratic governments, economic interdependence, and international law and organizations" may all be used to address the security challenge. Thus, as long as the United States is striving to promote democracy, the underlying motivations may be irrelevant. According to realism, all governments want to advance their own interests because this is the only way to maintain security under anarchic international systems. By viewing US foreign policy through a realist perspective, one can explore the underlying motivations for their activities in the Middle East, as promoting democracy, as the US says, does not directly advance itsinterests. Concerning Afghanistan, the US was unsure of the Soviet Union's operations in the country but considered them as an expansion of power, which would have been detrimental to US national security during the Cold War. This required it to do everything it can to avert this outcome, regardless of the ramifications for other states. For the United States, realism is ingrained in its national security policy, and this is unlikely to alter in the near future. Additionally, liberal theoriessay that other governments have an obligation to assist individuals denied human rights and that conceptions of sovereignty, imperialism, and even the preservation of order in international society must be pushed aside in favour of justice. Although liberalism just helps to describe the conditions necessary for international cooperation, the US has made a post-Cold War commitment to promote and maintain liberal values, as evident in the Middle East. From a liberal perspective, the United States' objectives in the Middle East are an attempt to stabilize the region and avert further violence caused by undemocratic governments; this will benefit both the United States' security and the security of civilians within the undemocratic state in question. While realism denies the significance of non-state players such as the United Nations, liberalism emphasizes these organizations, stating that they had a significant role in post-World War II wars."