I need help in these two case questions. Please answer each case in atleast 250 words and answer correctly and free plagiarized

Legal Scenario Reading 7: Torts in the Barney is a winning basketball coach at Central State whose contract is about to Workplace expire. Central State's athletic director has been authorized to offer Barney a new five year salary with a substantial salary increase. Barney had signed the contract and was ready to drop it off with the Athletic Director. Before he removed it out of his briefcase, however, the Athletic Director told Barney about a possible job with Eastern State. When Barney asked the AD for Central State what to do, Barney was told he ought to give Eastern a call. Barney followed that advice and was offered a better deal by Eastern. Is Central State's athletic director guilty of tortious interference with contract-- why or why not If so, what is Central State entitled to recover as damages? 1 Legal Scenario Reading 8: Privacy Part New York has a law that states if, after a job offer, an employer wants to revoke the offer based on the existence of criminal record, the employer must explain why and also provide a copy of any background check and give the applicant three business days to respond. Sally applied for a job as a waitress at a well know New York restaurant but, after a background check was performed, Sally was denied employment. She filed a lawsuit claiming violations of the law and discrimination in that she was never given a copy of the background check and was never told why she was not hired and was not told that even if her prior conviction was used against her she ought to have the opportunity to explain it away. Based on these very limited facts, will Sally win her lawsuit? Why or why not