I need some help understanding the crosstabulation.

What is it saying exactly? should I accept or reject the null hypothesis?

Trust No trust Rarely Trust Neutral Somewhat Trust 9 Alot Total 35 6 5 9 6 6 32 68 37 52 18 207 4 5 3 2 0 14 41 50 21 30 6 148 Religio Catholic n Protestant, Mainline Protestant or Protestant non- Evangelical M Non-Christian Eastern Religion Belisin None (Believes in a Supreme Entity but does wat not belong to any religion) Evangelical and Protestant Traditional or Native Religion Jewish (Orthodox Conservative, Reform) Jehovah's Witness Other Total 109 154 120 163 64 | 610 25 44 21 39 8 8 137 0 2 1 2 0 5 8 8 5 7 2 3 25 41 266 46 379 39 258 52 351 16 121 194 1375 Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi- 46.352 32 .048 Square Likelihood Ratio 49.946 32 .023 Linear-by-Linear .000 1 .990 Association N of Valid Cases 1375 a. 14 cells (31.1%) have expected countless than 5. The minimum expected count is .44. Symmetric Measures Value .184 .092 Approx Sig. .048 .048 Nominal by Phi Nominal Cramer's V Contingency Coefficient N of Valid Cases .181 .048 1375 Trust No trust Rarely Trust Neutral Somewhat Trust 9 Alot Total 35 6 5 9 6 6 32 68 37 52 18 207 4 5 3 2 0 14 41 50 21 30 6 148 Religio Catholic n Protestant, Mainline Protestant or Protestant non- Evangelical M Non-Christian Eastern Religion Belisin None (Believes in a Supreme Entity but does wat not belong to any religion) Evangelical and Protestant Traditional or Native Religion Jewish (Orthodox Conservative, Reform) Jehovah's Witness Other Total 109 154 120 163 64 | 610 25 44 21 39 8 8 137 0 2 1 2 0 5 8 8 5 7 2 3 25 41 266 46 379 39 258 52 351 16 121 194 1375 Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi- 46.352 32 .048 Square Likelihood Ratio 49.946 32 .023 Linear-by-Linear .000 1 .990 Association N of Valid Cases 1375 a. 14 cells (31.1%) have expected countless than 5. The minimum expected count is .44. Symmetric Measures Value .184 .092 Approx Sig. .048 .048 Nominal by Phi Nominal Cramer's V Contingency Coefficient N of Valid Cases .181 .048 1375