I prefer to keep my question and assignment information private and don't share it on google or anywhere else. in this small group discussion, please first work through the other elements in "The Complexities of Truth" section in the module. Posting Instructions (see Reply Instructions further down) 1. As you worked through the previous material, I asked you to write down your thoughts three times: 1) after reading George Monbiot's article, 2) after reading and watching the material from the Sustainable Fisheries website (responding to Monbiot's article and to Seaspiracy), and 3) after reading the Jacobin article. Please copy and paste that reflection into your post. Separate your response by text - in other words, we should see three separate sections. 2. After copying and pasting that reflection, please respond to the following in a separate paragraph: A. We started this exercise with a question: Is not eating fish the best way to help the oceans? So, where does all of this back and forth leave us in terms of answering this question? For example, at this point, do you feel like there is a clear answer despite the conflicting information? B. I titled this section of the module "The Complexities of Truth." One other thing I'd like you to share your thoughts about is this: We've stuck our toes in only a small part of the debate around Seaspiracy. We could keep finding other sources that add to both sides. And, as you've probably noted from your own research, there is a lot of conflicting information out there about all of these topics we're exploring. How is a person supposed to make up their mind about a complex issue like this? All the sources we looked at are credible, though they are coming at the issue from their own perspectives that are shaped by different factors. Where does all this leave us in terms of being able to find the "truth" about something? Use simple vocabulary and not use Ai at all I prefer to keep my question and assignment information private and don't share it on google or anywhere else. Is discussion I prefer responses written in the first person, using simple vocabulary and in a conversational tone