i really need help fixing my paper and with the data with the math. im trying my best can pleasse help with whole assgemnt no AI please

2. Partial Introduction

The purpose of the study was to conduct undergrad to be able to tell the difference of the cognitive process with each person and how the effect of memory can be performed. One of the main things that were used to conduct This research was orthographic, semantic, and multimodal. To be able to determine the process because it has multiple senses that could be able to lead to a better memory or being able to recall and compare the processing which involved a deeper understanding of words and being able to have a visual form. Individuals had to identify a non-living thing in a living thing because it helps process from memory a lot more better seeing people speak cognitively and cognitively wise allowing to give an ideology of different standpoints. The multimodal will have better processing with high results and remembering compared to the orthographic processing. According to Craik and Lockhart (1972), "Since the organism is normally concerned only with the extraction of meaning from the stimuli, it is advantageous to store the products of such deep analyses, while there is usually no need to store the products of preliminary analyses." This means that you could be able to process information with evidence stored and bring information.

The semantic will have a better performance when it comes to remembering we used to visual because remembering a character you could be able to add that into a lifestyle and individuals could be able to remember a living thing. According to "One of the results of this perceptual analysis is the memory trace. Such features of the trace as its coding characteristics and its persistence thus arise essentially as byproducts of perceptual processing (Morton, 1970). Specifically, we suggest that trace persistence is a function of depth of analysis, with deeper levels of analysis associated with more elaborate, longer-lasting, and stronger traces.

Orthographic processing will have a better chance of outdoing semantics because to be able to remember a lawn living thing, a person can relate back to their childhood. Are there any apartments in your life by remembering the sound. According to Morton "preliminary stages are concerned with the analysis of such physical or sensory features... while later stages are more concerned with matching the input against stored abstractions from past learning." This suggests that the initial, sensory-focused stages of processing can be critical for memory formation.

- rationale (explanation) for why that is your hypothesis The Orthographic processing of memory is shows a visual aspect of a word because you could be able to remember destruction of the appearance of the picture this type of processing Taps into a personal experience so an individual engage in processing they often relate to future of words or similarities of patterns that they had in their past experience for an example you can recognize the shape that you were taught when you were in kindergarten that word Might Recall an experiment or different environment you want to send the hard characteristics that bring back memory retention.And this is why I chose this as my hypothesis because this is going to prove that it has better retention when it comes to memory when it comes to undergrad remember a certain words and letters

3. Complete Method section

- Participants, Measures, Procedure (see Method Section handout in Lab Resources folder)

The participants were undergraduates from the University of California, who participated in the study. The participants were 18 and older, each with an equal amount of males and an amount of females to participate in the study. The instructor read off non-living and living words the individual who were undergraduates had to remember each of the words. All the participants had to report how many words they remembered in the lab classroom.

Procedure The participants were randomly assigned to different (orthographic, semantic, multimodal).The participants had to complete different procedures when it came to one individual writing down another individual remembering each word by count in order to complete the memory test and recall the performance of all three when it comes to retaining memory processing. The memory test participants had the count each vow and participants had the category it's a non-living thing and participants saw both in each word creating a mental image of the world and after the participants completed the recall to they reported back to the professor how many words that was recalled that was a dependent variable

4. Complete Results section (including APA-formatted Figure) Including - summary statistics and overall results, lay summary in non-statistical terms with Ms and SDs and direction of the effect, with each pairwise comparison presented, reference to the Figure where it makes sense; APA formatted statistics

5. Partial Discussion section

- Restate findings briefly in relation to the hypotheses (were they supported or not and what it means if they were/weren't supported)

Rationale: The goal of this assignment is to gain additional experience with the results section and to practice writing the hypotheses section of the introduction, method, discussion sections.

For this assignment, you will write up the results from the ANOVA experiment. You should use data from your own lab for the analysis. should conform to and should include the following manuscript components:

1. Title page (use the professional paper requirements)

2. Partial Introduction

- state the purpose of the present study - what is it looking at?

- specific hypotheses for each comparison

- rationale (explanation) for why that is your hypothesis

3. Complete Method section

- Participants, Measures, Procedure (see Method Section handout in Lab Resources folder)

4. Complete Results section (including APA-formatted Figure)

Including - summary statistics and overall results, lay summary in non-statistical terms with Ms and SDs and direction of the effect, with each pairwise comparison presented, reference to the Figure where it makes sense; APA formatted statistics

5. Partial Discussion section

- Restate findings briefly in relation to the hypotheses (were they supported or not and what it means if they were/weren't supported)

- 2 specific limitations, including specifically how it could have impacted the results and what could be done in future work to avoid the limitation

For the purpose of this assignment, you will NOT need to include an abstract, or literature review portion of the introduction.

This criterion introductions Purpose of study (3 points); Specific hypotheses (4 points); Rationale for hypotheses (3 points) This criterion for Method Participants (3 points); Materials (4 points); Procedure (3 points)

This criterion for Results Summary statistics and overall results (3 points); Lay summary with Ms, SDs, and effect direction (2 points); Each pairwise comparison presented (3 points); APA-formatted Figure (2 points)

This criterion Discussion Restatement of findings in relation to hypotheses (3 points); Discussion of findings' implications (3 points); Identification of 2 limitations (2 points