I think the answer has to do with symbolic speech and the first amendment of the bill of rights. NEED HELLP ANSWERING THE 4 QUESTIONS FOR CASE PROBLEM #2 !!

.. not too sure ! need help ! Just the CASE PROBLEM #2 !!!

See case summary in Textbook, Reviewing section at end of chapter 4 (page 90). Respond to Questions 2 through 4. Note: these questions follow the IRAC structure. What are the three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution? Which standard of scrutiny, or test, would apply to this situation? Why? Applying this standard (test), is the helmet statute constitutional? Explain why? Concerned with disruption of traffic and noise, the City of Pandomonium (similar in many respects to our own City of Pomona) passed a Noise and Parade Ordinance requiring City approval to hold a parade. The ordinance defined a parade as gatherings of ten or more people that would not follow traffic laws and would advocate or celebrate an idea (without regard to content). Among other restrictions it included a provision limiting downtown daytime parades to two one-hour parades per week starting only at 10 a.m. or 2 p.m. A Union sought to hold a parade in support of a strike by professors at the nearby Pandomonium University, protesting being overworked and underpaid. They planned to begin the parade on a Friday evening at 6:00 p.m., to take a route through the downtown of the City, to use bullhorns, and to conclude with a rally at nearby Founding Fathers Public Park. While uncertain, they anticipated that between 50 - 150 individuals would be participating in the parade. Upon denial of a permit by the City the Union sued, claiming that the ordinance was unconstitutional. What area of the law, when applied to these facts, determines the outcome of this case? Summarize the law that applies in determining whether the ordinance is constitutional? Analyze how the law applies to these facts. State your conclusion. See Text, Questions and Problems @ END of chapter 6 (page 133). Case Problem "Richard is an employee of Dunn Construction ...., alleging libel on the basis of the See case summary in Textbook, Reviewing section at end of chapter 4 (page 90). Respond to Questions 2 through 4. Note: these questions follow the IRAC structure. What are the three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution? Which standard of scrutiny, or test, would apply to this situation? Why? Applying this standard (test), is the helmet statute constitutional? Explain why? Concerned with disruption of traffic and noise, the City of Pandomonium (similar in many respects to our own City of Pomona) passed a Noise and Parade Ordinance requiring City approval to hold a parade. The ordinance defined a parade as gatherings of ten or more people that would not follow traffic laws and would advocate or celebrate an idea (without regard to content). Among other restrictions it included a provision limiting downtown daytime parades to two one-hour parades per week starting only at 10 a.m. or 2 p.m. A Union sought to hold a parade in support of a strike by professors at the nearby Pandomonium University, protesting being overworked and underpaid. They planned to begin the parade on a Friday evening at 6:00 p.m., to take a route through the downtown of the City, to use bullhorns, and to conclude with a rally at nearby Founding Fathers Public Park. While uncertain, they anticipated that between 50 - 150 individuals would be participating in the parade. Upon denial of a permit by the City the Union sued, claiming that the ordinance was unconstitutional. What area of the law, when applied to these facts, determines the outcome of this case? Summarize the law that applies in determining whether the ordinance is constitutional? Analyze how the law applies to these facts. State your conclusion. See Text, Questions and Problems @ END of chapter 6 (page 133). Case Problem "Richard is an employee of Dunn Construction ...., alleging libel on the basis of the