i want answer for only second question starting with case of R.V

What is the policy rationale for contractual quantum meruit? Select one a. The parties intention to impose a penalty should be upheld. b. The assistance provided by implied terms is sporadic and uncertain c. Parties who fail to document their contracts should nonetheless be bound by their promises. d. It is not the intention of the parties that goods or services are provided for free. In the case of R. v. Ron Engineering & Construction Ltd. (1981) 1 S.C.R. 111, the Supreme Court of Canada reformed the legal structure concerning the tendering process in Canada. What did the Supreme Court state would form an element of the reformed legal structure? Select one: a. Every party submitting a tender is accepting the offer of Contract B. b. The call for tender offered a preliminary contract called Contract A. O c The call for tender offered a preliminary contract forming Contract B. d. The only successful tenderer would enter into a Contract A with the owner