I would suggest a new evaluation method as quickly as possible. If we're hiring people who score highly on the test and that's resulting in low quality hires, then that would clearly suggest that the current evaluation method isn't resulting in finding good fits for the organization. Some aspect of the scoring isn't tied to a new hire's production level, cultural fit, or actual skillset. I would suggest restructured interviews that maybe use more standardized questioning. If the questions being asked are a little all over the place, that would help ensure that we're not showing any bias and can renew focus on what we're really looking for in a new hire. I would suggest that the standardized questions include some form of behavioral assessment as well in order to better gauge their morals and cultural alignment. I'm also a big advocate for a practical component during the evaluation process and would suggest that one be implemented wherever possible. Getting a more hands on approach with a potential hire and being provided a thorough skill assessment can help save so much on time and resources in the long run if we have to rehire after it turns out that an