Question: If a constant cluster occurs in a language, do you think that it should automatically be considered a legal phonotactic sequence in the langauge? For
If a constant cluster occurs in a language, do you think that it should automatically be considered a legal phonotactic sequence in the langauge? For example, do you think that fi should be considered phototactically legal in English because it occurs in the words schlep and schlocky?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
